When Excel is enough
The conditions where a workbook is still the right system, and where a larger commissions product is a better fit than CompDay.
Read the boundaryFree tool · no login
Enter the shape of the plan. The checker returns a score, the edge cases to test, a sample payout matrix, and the rules that get lost in a spreadsheet.
It runs in the browser. It does not ask for names, deal amounts, or an account. The score is a rubric, not a benchmark and not a savings claim.
Complexity score
| Rep | Attainment | Rate | Credit | Payout |
|---|
When software is worth a look
Use the score as a filter. A low score means stay in the sheet. A high score means the next conversation is whether the rules can be versioned and explained. The score does not estimate savings. CompDay’s list price is $10 per payee per month. Fit and scope are confirmed on a demo.
Book a demoThe whole model
Each input adds 0, 1, or 2. Nothing is weighted by industry, and nothing is compared with another company.
| Input | 0 points | 1 point | 2 points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reps | 1 to 5 | 6 to 20 | 21 or more |
| Plans | 1 | 2 | 3 or more |
| Tiers | One rate | One threshold | Multiple accelerators |
| Splits | None | Occasional | Regular, or an overlay |
| Clawbacks or draws | None | Sometimes | Part of the plan |
| Mid-period changes | None this year | Rare | Most cycles |
| Data sources | One | Two | Three or more |
| Disputes | No extra review | A manager signs off | Reps dispute numbers |
The conditions where a workbook is still the right system, and where a larger commissions product is a better fit than CompDay.
Read the boundaryWhat to do with deals dated before and after the edit, and which quota dollars were already counted.
Read the sequenceCredit versus commission, overlays, and a refund that arrives after payroll copied the total.
Read the casesThe process checkup asks where the work is still manual. This checker asks whether the plan itself is hard to re-explain.